There is a peculiar magic in Taylor Swift’s music. One moment, she whispers heartbreak so precise it feels like she is narrating your own diary, and the next, she paints youthful rebellion in colors so vivid it is impossible not to remember your first love. Fans find solace in tracks like 'All Too Well' or 'Cardigan', feeling seen, understood, and perfectly voiced. Yet for some, this connection has crossed into territory far less comforting, where admiration collides with accusations of intellectual appropriation. This is precisely the dilemma Kimberly Marasco claims to face.

With that in mind, Kimberly Marasco has taken Taylor Swift to court, claiming that Taylor Swift stole her poetry. 

While Taylor Swift has accumulated global fame and considerable wealth, Kimberly Marasco, an author and poet from Fort Pierce, Florida, has remained relatively unknown outside literary circles. Marasco shares her life with two beagles, Cody and Roxy, and enjoys outdoor activities with her partner Todd, including beach trips, park visits, and hiking excursions. Holding a bachelor’s degree in history and an MBA, she balances her personal passions with her professional work as a writer, quietly building a portfolio of creative literature.

Marasco has published three works according to Goodreads, establishing herself as a versatile author and poet. Her writings explore themes ranging from personal reflection to social observation, blending narrative skill with lyrical expression. Despite a modest public profile, Marasco has drawn attention recently for her legal actions against Taylor Swift, who recently snagged a major music win, alleging that the pop superstar incorporated elements of her poetry into chart-topping songs without permission or credit. 

Taylor Swift on Jimmy Fallon’s 'Tonight Show': When, Where, & How Can You Watch the Interview

Kimberly Marasco might be an obscure author, but she knows exactly how to grab the spotlight, as can be seen by her recent trip to the court. 

Kimberly Marasco initially filed a lawsuit against Taylor Swift Productions Inc. in April, seeking a nominal sum of $100. The case was later elevated from small claims court to the Southern District of Florida, under the oversight of Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon. Marasco has expanded her claim, requesting more than $7 million in damages, and cited over a dozen songs from Taylor Swift’s albums 'Lover', 'Folklore', 'Midnights', and 'The Tortured Poets Department', alleging that Swift incorporated themes and texts from her poems Fallen from Grace and Dealing with Chronic Illness: Vestibular Neuritis.

Marasco also asserts that Taylor Swift’s choreography for 'Vigilante Shit' during the Eras Tour mirrors a dance routine she created. The lawsuit took months to serve, with Florida’s secretary of state assisting in December. Marasco has additionally authored Swift Reflections: Poetry Inspirations, highlighting what she perceives as direct similarities between her poetry and songs such as 'Getaway Car', 'The Man', and 'Right Where You Left Me'. The case finally came to a close with the verdict in Taylor Swift's favor. 

Why ‘1989’ Was Taylor Swift’s First Pop Album - And the Right Time to Leave Country Music

What do you think about Kimberly Marasco's allegations? Let us know in the comments down below!