It is a truth universally acknowledged that cinema, much like fashion trends and slang, evolves with each new generation. The films that once had audiences gasping in awe now risk being called “mid” in TikTok comments. A romantic comedy like You’ve Got Mail may warm millennial hearts, while Gen Z prefers the emotional destruction of Past Lives. Meanwhile, cult classics like Mean Girls face critique for being “problematic,” and Fight Club is rebranded as a red flag. Naturally, this generational shift has its casualties.

One of them? The Dark Knight, whose legacy is now under siege in the digital coliseum of X and Letterboxd.

Film commentator Brendan Hodges recently sparked a generational debate on social media by highlighting how The Dark Knight has become less beloved among younger audiences, particularly Gen Z. According to Hodges, the film’s 2008 release was a near-religious experience for many millennials, but its grounded aesthetics, such as the Chicago-inspired Gotham and a realistic Batsuit, are now viewed by some as a departure from a more faithful comic book style. This shift in perception, he suggests, reflects evolving cinematic expectations.

Hodges, presumably nursing an Alfred-approved glass of scotch, also declared that the film’s “gritty” reputation has been thoroughly exaggerated. He insists Christopher Nolan’s Batman was never ashamed to have a little fun, even while brooding. Meanwhile, Reeves’ The Batman, whose sequel might start filming soon, now carries the somber torch, leaving Nolan’s trilogy to be misremembered as all angst and no irony. In short, the cultural tides have turned, and millennials must now watch their heroes age under the harsh lighting of Gen Z reviews.

‘Dark Knight’s David Goyer Tells the Haunting Tale of a Batman Graveyard Filled With Abandoned Scripts

Brendan Hodges may have logged off, but the cinematic civil war he ignited could rage across generations like Gotham gossip.

Millennials are not blind to the cinematic power of The Batman by Matt Reeves, many admire its brooding tone and haunting visuals. But for them, The Dark Knight was not merely a film; it was a cultural earthquake that shook 2008. Christian Bale’s gravelly voice, Heath Ledger’s terrifying brilliance, and a Hans Zimmer score that felt like caffeine for the soul, it was the moment every group chat became a Gotham think tank.

Gen Z or critiques hiding under the guise of Gen Z, armed with no fear of film Twitter backlash, has little reverence for Christopher Nolan’s Bat-era. Many find Christian Bale’s performance stiff, call the dialogue cringe-inducing, and label the trilogy as “overrated.” For them, the grit is not nuanced, the realism feels aged, and the Joker’s chaos does not hit the same after years of memeification. They admire the legacy, but will not hesitate to poke a few holes in the cape.

What one generation hails as holy, another dissects with algorithmic precision. The Dark Knight discourse reveals more than shifting tastes; it shows how cinema evolves through cultural lenses. Whether viewed as mythic storytelling or just a long night in Gotham, Nolan’s Batman will remain a cinematic landmark, debated, and rewatched. Somewhere between reverence and roast lies the truth, and maybe that is what makes this Bat-tale so endlessly compelling.

The Merc With a Mouth Meets the Dark Knight: Marvel and DC’s First Most Wanted Crossover Is Finally Happening

Whose side are you on in this debate? Let us know your take on The Dark Knight in the comments down below!