Judge Rejects Justin Baldoni Team’s Letter: Claims of Blake Lively Threatening Taylor Swift Dismissed

Hollywood's latest soap opera just cranked the melodrama dial to eleven! The Blake Lively-Justin Baldoni courtroom showdown has morphed into a celebrity circus featuring unexpected guest star Taylor Swift. Like a plot twist worthy of their romantic drama film, accusations flew between the feuding camps with the intensity of awards season gossip. One side tried to pull pop royalty into the drama with shocking claims, only to watch the judicial gavel come crashing down with decisive authority.
While Hollywood loves a good cliffhanger, Judge Lewis J. Liman clearly prefers tight scripts, snipping out the courtroom drama’s juiciest subplot before it could hijack the spotlight altogether.
Judge slams Justin Baldoni’s Taylor Swift defense attempt
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Federal Judge Lewis J. Liman delivered a mic-drop moment, tossing out Justin Baldoni's team's explosive claims that Blake Lively tried strong-arming Taylor Swift into becoming her public defender. A spokesperson for Lively told The Post, as reported by the New York Post, that the court deemed these claims “improper” and “irrelevant.” Liman granted Lively's motion to strike both the affidavit and letter, warning Baldoni's courtroom team that continuing such theatrical antics might earn them sanctions, Hollywood's version of a director’s time-out.
Attorney Bryan Freedman's tabloid-worthy letter said Blake Lively's team threatened to release Taylor Swift's private messages unless she publicly backed her Gossip Girl alumna bestie. This anonymous-source bombshell, more explosive than a Marvel movie finale, claimed insider knowledge of the supposed scheme. Swift's team swiftly denied everything, her spokesperson emphasizing the pop sensation's complete disconnect from this celebrity court cage match.
While Taylor Swift’s team stood united on the Bryan Freedman claim, Blake Lively’s strained ties did not hold her crew back; they fired back hard, leading to Judge Liman’s mic-drop ruling.
Taylor Swift drama backfires as Blake Lively’s team hits hard
The original affidavit spun a tale worthy of screenwriting awards, suggesting Blake Lively needed Taylor Swift's star power following her Super Bowl absence to win the PR battle. Bryan Freedman's mystery source possessed detailed knowledge about pressure tactics and vanishing messages. Lively's attorney, Mike Gottlieb, did not hold back, dismissing the claims as pure fiction and warning of courtroom consequences for twisting procedures into tabloid bait. The bold defense paid off, leading to the court tossing out Justin Baldoni’s team’s explosive accusations.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Meanwhile, the courtroom showdown continues like a franchise that refuses to end, with Blake Lively’s misconduct and retaliation claims going head-to-head with Justin Baldoni’s jaw-dropping $400 million countersuit. Taylor Swift's camp reacted to subpoena attempts with Grammy-worthy indignation, reiterating her total disassociation from It Ends With Us. As March 2026's trial looms larger than a summer blockbuster release date, the court insists focus remain on the central case, not Hollywood's latest attempt at crafting distracting, unauthorized spinoffs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What is your take on the judge tossing out Justin Baldoni’s team’s claims? Let us know in the comments below.
ADVERTISEMENT
Edited By: Aliza Siddiqui
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT